Please Note: Our e-mail address when we reply to you will show as "FMCSA Customer Service". To ensure timely and effective e-mail delivery, please check your spam folders and settings to allow e-mails from this address.
Why are there multiple effective dates for the Unified Registration System (URS) rule?
FMCSA set November 1, 2013 as the compliance date for the biennial update requirements because motor carriers are already required to update their registration information biennially under 49 CFR 390.19 and the information is very valuable to the Agency in carrying out its safety mission.
On November 1, 2013, (1) the new enforcement provisions for failing to file biennial updates according to the schedule in 49 CFR 390.19(b)(2), and (2) a prohibition on operating with an inactive USDOT Number took effect.
On January 17, 2017, FMCSA published a Federal Register notice suspending the January 14 and April 14 2017 URS effectiveness dates for the following:
- All entities must process new applications and updates to existing records using the new online application. FMCSA will not accept paper forms or faxes and will discontinue the use of MC/FF numbers.
- The requirement for all existing private and exempt carriers to provide evidence of financial responsibility (insurance filings and surety bonds/trusts) and process agent designation (BOC-3) will take effect. New applicants will begin providing this information as soon as URS takes effect.
To read the 2015 URS Federal Register notice, click here.
Answers others found helpful
- When does the Unified Registration System (URS) rule go into effect?
- What are the benefits of the new Unified Registration System (URS) rule?
- Who is required to comply with the Unified Registration System (URS) rule?
- What changes have been made to the schedule for the Unified Registration System (URS) roll-out?
- What percentage of entities that currently only use paper forms will be affected by the Unified Registration System (URS) rule and what options do they have to file electronically?
